Electric power distribution systems · Mississippi

Central Electric Power Assocation

Carthage, MS · ~102 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Electric Power Assocation runs at 345% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Electric Power Assocation: 4.1 TCR = 345% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Electric Power Assocation safety composite

Central Electric Power Assocation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Electric Power Assocation: 2.6 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2024

Central Electric Power Assocation's TCR rose 0.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Carthage, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.1 · 345% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #47/65
  • PHOTO Perry Hall Service C…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perry Hall Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Central Electric Power Assocation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Electric Power Assocation averages 4.1 TCR (345% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Electric Power Assocation TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=3.4 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Central Electric Power Assocation falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 65 Electric power distribution sy employers in Mississippi.

Central Electric Power Assocation (102 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Electric Power Assocation
Central Electric Power Assocation (102 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Central Electric Power Assocation has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 0.8 4 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 4 0 0
2020 4.2 2.5 5 0 0
2019 5.2 2.6 6 0 0
2018 4.5 1.8 5 0 0
2017 6.0 1.7 7 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MS · Carthage

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 18 employers in Carthage, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perry Hall Service Center 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Access Energy Cooperative 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall County REMC 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brookhaven, MS 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Contract Fabricators, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metal Coaters of Mississippi 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nidec Motor Corporation 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carthage Plant (Choctaw) 1,534 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pearl River Foods LLC 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR 305 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 305 195 FTE
NAT-TCR East Clinical 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Augusta Coating and Manufacturing 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gabriel N. A. Distribution (Ride Control, LLC) 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Silverdale Office 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE A-Verdi COS LLC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rugby Manufacturing 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hill International Trucks ELO 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Curry College 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.