Centers, senior citizens' · Minnesota

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212

Apple Valley, MN · ~259 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 runs at 405% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Centers, senior citizens' workplace, earning a grade F.

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212: 15.4 TCR = 405% of Centers, senior citizens' BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 safety composite

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 30.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212: 7.2 → 30.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 30.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.96× in 2020

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212's TCR rose 23.5 from 7.2 in 2016 to 30.6 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Apple Valley, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 405% of ind

  • DART 30.1 DART
  • RANK #37/44
  • PHOTO The Resource Center …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 94 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Resource Center - Celoron A (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 averages 15.4 TCR (405% of the Centers, senior citizens' BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=13.4 · 2020=30.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 falls in its industry

1,320 Centers, senior citizens' establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 44 Centers, senior citizens' employers in Minnesota.

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 (259 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212
Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 (259 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 has more employees than the Centers, senior citizens' median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 30.6 30.1 13 48 0
2019 13.4 9.8 26 0 0
2018 12.6 8.8 21 2 0
2017 13.1 8.2 22 2 0
2016 7.2 2.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Apple Valley

1,320 Centers, senior citizens' employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 91 employers in Apple Valley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Resource Center - Celoron A 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life-Skills Inc. Administration Office 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES - PALM SPRINGS 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Resource Center - Foote Avenue A2 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Piping Inc. 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Princeton1 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV Medical Transportation 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Hospital District 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Apple Valley 880 FTE
CITY-NEAR Uponor - Apple Valley 682 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2390 - Apple Valley South 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2642 416 FTE
NAT-TCR St Francis of Bellingham 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Thor Motor Coach/Plant 350 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR University Living 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shop 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Instrumentation Laboratory 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer inc. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oracle Hillsboro 3380 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bridgeport West Virginia 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.