Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · New York

Instrumentation Laboratory

Orangeburg, NY · ~259 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Instrumentation Laboratory runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Instrumentation Laboratory: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Instrumentation Laboratory safety composite

Instrumentation Laboratory scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Instrumentation Laboratory: 2.4 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.33× in 2020

Instrumentation Laboratory's TCR rose 0.9 from 2.4 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Orangeburg, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO InBios International…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: InBios International Inc. 307 Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Instrumentation Laboratory in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Instrumentation Laboratory averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Instrumentation Laboratory TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Instrumentation Laboratory falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in New York.

Instrumentation Laboratory (259 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Instrumentation Laboratory
Instrumentation Laboratory (259 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Instrumentation Laboratory has more employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.2 2.9 7 2 0
2019 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2018 3.3 1.5 9 0 0
2017 1.6 0.8 4 0 0
2016 2.4 2.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · NY · Orangeburg

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 29 employers in Orangeburg, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR InBios International Inc. 307 Facility 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roche Molecular Systems Branchburg Site 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ortho Clinical Diagnostics B313 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrence facility 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE TC Electric 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Marquis Brooklyn 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goodwill Industries of WNY 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE 25320201 PELHAM MANOR, NY 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nice-Pak Prod. Inc / PDI Inc. 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Industries Inc 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crestron Electronics - Orangeburg, NY 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chromalloy New York 366 FTE
NAT-TCR Accella Polyurethane Systems LLC - Rancho 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Admin 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitsubishi Chemical Composites America, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Graphite Chicago Complex 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meijer inc. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augustana Apple Valley Campus 212 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accurus Aerospace Corporation - Tulsa 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oracle Hillsboro 3380 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.