Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435

Victoria, MN · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435: 7.9 TCR = 207% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 safety composite

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2018→2020

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 injury rate improved

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435's TCR fell 0.8 from 4.6 in 2018 to 3.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.6 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Victoria, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 207% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #133/240
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Pacific B…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Pacific Beach (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 averages 7.9 TCR (207% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 TCR series: 2018=4.6 · 2019=15.3 · 2020=3.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 (29 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435
Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 (29 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Augustana Emerald Crest Victoria #435 has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2019 15.3 10.2 3 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Victoria

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 3 employers in Victoria, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Pacific Beach 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senters 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Heights Senior Living 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5717 - Parkview in Allen 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Victoria 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Augustana EC Victoria 29 FTE
NAT-TCR Save A Lot #187 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Klein Steel Service Inc. - RPC 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill CFL - Rockledge 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Legacy Heights Senior Living 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Topweb LLC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wabash National North (Lafayette) 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.P. Sicard, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGC - Orlando Plant 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.