Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) · Minnesota
Fairmont Fire Department
Fairmont, MN · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 37.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Fairmont Fire Department runs at 1167% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 37.3
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 4
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Fairmont Fire Department's OSHA Total Case Rate of 37.3 to the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) BLS benchmark of 3.2 (1167% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Fairmont Fire Department's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.2 industry benchmark.
Where Fairmont Fire Department falls in its industry
1,057 Fire departments (e.g., govern establishmentsSafer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.5.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 58 Fire departments (e.g., govern employers in Minnesota.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 4 injuries, 1 illnesses shown on this page for Fairmont Fire Department are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 922160 - Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2023)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 5,536 hours worked = 0.00 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Fairmont Fire Department (this establishment) | 37.33 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) industry avg | 3.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 922160 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Fairmont Fire Department to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2023: 4 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 144.5 | 0.0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 37.3 | 37.3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Fairmont Fire Department's reported OSHA injury record versus its Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 1167% of the Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) benchmark, Fairmont Fire Department reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Fire departments (e.g., government, volunteer (except private)) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Fairmont Fire Department's safety grade?
How many injuries has Fairmont Fire Department reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in Fairmont - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~37.3)
Similar size (~29 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.