Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Augustana Home Health 238

Minneapolis, MN · ~82 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Augustana Home Health 238 runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Augustana Home Health 238: 8.3 TCR = 219% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Augustana Home Health 238 safety composite

Augustana Home Health 238 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2020

Augustana Home Health 238 injury rate improved

Augustana Home Health 238's TCR fell 5.7 from 14.5 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.5 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=8.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 219% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #144/240
  • PHOTO SLC Assisted Living
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SLC Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Augustana Home Health 238 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Augustana Home Health 238 averages 8.3 TCR (219% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Augustana Home Health 238 TCR series: 2016=14.5 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=8.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Augustana Home Health 238 falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #144 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Augustana Home Health 238 (82 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Augustana Home Health 238
Augustana Home Health 238 (82 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Augustana Home Health 238 has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.9 8.9 1 2 0
2019 8.3 8.3 3 0 0
2018 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 2 0 0
2016 14.5 4.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Minneapolis

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SLC Assisted Living 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Staunton 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Paulin Creek 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Barrington Woods 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frerichs Construction 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE RRSC Minneapolis/St. Paul Market 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CD Tile & Stone 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lofton Label, Inc 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Sharp Coronado Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinnacle Health Facilities XIX 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Town & Country Supermarket #3807 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Morningside of Fayetteville 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE River Glen of Saint Charles 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Country Sports Center - West 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Country Sports Center - Millhopper 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Entergy Louisiana LLC New Orleans Gas Distribution Business Tulane 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.