Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Georgia

Austell SDO

Austell, GA · ~45 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Austell SDO runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Austell SDO: 4.8 TCR = 75% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Austell SDO safety composite

Austell SDO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Austell SDO: 2.4 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2019

Austell SDO's TCR rose 1.3 from 2.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Austell, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.8 · 75% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #59/210
  • PHOTO GASWA - SWAINSBORO
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GASWA - SWAINSBORO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Austell SDO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Austell SDO averages 4.8 TCR (75% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Austell SDO TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=10.8 · 2019=3.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Austell SDO falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 210 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Georgia.

Austell SDO (45 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Austell SDO
Austell SDO (45 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Austell SDO has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2018 10.8 9.0 6 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · GA · Austell

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 113 employers in Austell, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GASWA - SWAINSBORO 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCSHE - SHELBY 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMSTERDAM (NYAMS) 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elsa Logistics Inc 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CWT Farms International 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camilla Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens TMC - 1004 Boulevard Athens, GA 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombard 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Cobb Hospital 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Six Flags Over Georgia 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATLANTA OPERA WAREHOUSE 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plateau Excavation, Inc 762 FTE
NAT-TCR 30514 - Capstone Americold Gouldsboro 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkdale Manor 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Modula Lewiston 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 8935 Lv Stucco 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Tech Machinery (Denver, CO) 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Easter Seals Hawaii - Maui Service Center 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Building Products, LLC d/b/a Signature Stone 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE U.S. Nameplate Co. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.