Explosives manufacturing · Tennessee

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette

Lafollette, TN · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Explosives manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette: 5.6 TCR = 169% of Explosives manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette safety composite

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette: 0.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 15.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2024

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette's TCR rose 4.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325920 · Lafollette, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 169% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Alpha Dyno Nobel - L…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette averages 5.6 TCR (169% of the Explosives manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=15.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=5 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette falls in its industry

78 Explosives manufacturing establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Explosives manufacturing employers in Tennessee.

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette (22 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette
Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette (22 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette has fewer employees than the Explosives manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.3 5.2 2 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 15.4 10.3 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325920 · TN · Lafollette

78 Explosives manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 11 employers in Lafollette, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxam Initiations Systems, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpha Dyno Nobel -- Mojave, CA 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC. 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tosh Pork Herrondale 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longtown Supply Co. Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville Growout 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Tennessee EMC - Henderson 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pyro Shows, Inc. 578 FTE
CITY-NEAR DeRoyal LaFollette 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cumberland Village 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dixie Roofing, Inc. - LaFollette 127 FTE
NAT-TCR SportChassis LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HTC LaPorte 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Distinguished Development Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PSI Urethanes, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Village of Heyworth 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beaver Creek Products, LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterworks 108 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owatonna Agronomy 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.