Explosives manufacturing · California

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA

Lincoln, CA · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA runs at 168% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Explosives manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA: 5.6 TCR = 168% of Explosives manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA safety composite

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2022

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA injury rate improved

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA's TCR fell 2.2 from 4.6 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=12.0 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325920 · Lincoln, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 168% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Maxam Initiations Sy…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maxam Initiations Systems, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA averages 5.6 TCR (168% of the Explosives manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=12 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA falls in its industry

78 Explosives manufacturing establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Explosives manufacturing employers in California.

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA (42 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA
Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA (42 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA has fewer employees than the Explosives manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2020 7.7 7.7 3 1 0
2019 12.0 10.0 6 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2017 4.6 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325920 · CA · Lincoln

78 Explosives manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 43 employers in Lincoln, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maxam Initiations Systems, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Austin Powder Midsouth - LaFollette 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Energetic Systems, LLC. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpha Dyno Nobel -- Mojave, CA 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thunder Valley Casino Resort 2,478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Placer Unified School District 716 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Pacific Industries 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR JBR Inc, dba SFBGC, dba RFC 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Stanco Metal Products - New Mexico 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Foods International USA 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Stop & Shop 2815 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE La-Z-Boy Casegoods Repair and Distribution Center 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Tupelo Medical Clinic 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Houses of Texas - Austin Live Oak 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bio Springer North America Corporation 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.