Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing · Ohio

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield

Name: Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Garfield, OH · ~89 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield: 1.3 TCR = 41% of Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield safety composite

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
DART rate: C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield: 0.9 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.91× in 2024

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.9 in 2021 to 2.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326111 · Garfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 41% of ind

DART 1.2 DART
RANK #7/27
PHOTO Zim's Bagging-Main P…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Zim's Bagging-Main Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Sharp Packagin

1.4
This site

1.3
Zim's Bagging-

1.3
CDF Corporatio

1.3
Advanced Poly

1.3

What this shows Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield averages 1.3 TCR (41% of the Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield TCR series: 2021=0.9 · 2022=1 · 2023=1 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield falls in its industry

322 Bags, plastics film, single wa establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 27 Bags, plastics film, single wa employers in Ohio.

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield (89 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield has fewer employees than the Bags, plastics film, single wall or mult median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2024	2.4	1.2	2
2023	1.0	1.0	1
2022	1.0	1.0	1
2021	0.9	0.0	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326111 · OH · Garfield

322 Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Zim's Bagging-Main Plant	PRICHARD, WV	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive	SUSSEX, WI	1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	CDF Corporation	77 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD. PLYMOUTH, MA 02360, MA	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Advanced Poly Packaging, Inc.	AKRON, OH	1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Mimi Farms Inc. dba Mucci Farms Ohio	HURON	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	System Office - Piketon	PIKETON	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Professional Restoration Service Inc	MEDINA	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	105609 - Ross and Fayette 222MWdc Solar	MADISON	89 FTE
NAT-TCR	Pilgrims Moorefield Live Haul	Moorefield, WV	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Stanton, MN	Stanton, MN	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cross Technologies Inc Des Moines	Des Moines, IA	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cutting Edge Laser Machining, Inc.	Covington, GA	1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	First Flight Middle	Kill Devil Hills, NC	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Metro Companies INC dba Metro Xpress	Wichita, KS	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Northern Montana Health Care Clinics	Havre, MT	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cross Technologies Inc Whitsett	Whitsett, NC	89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.