Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive

Sussex, WI · ~132 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive safety composite

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive held a steady TCR band

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.2 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326111 · Sussex, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #8/34
  • PHOTO Automated Packaging …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive falls in its industry

322 Bags, plastics film, single wa establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 34 Bags, plastics film, single wa employers in Wisconsin.

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive (132 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive
Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive (132 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Sharp Packaging Systems-Silver Spring Drive has more employees than the Bags, plastics film, single wall or mult median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2016 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326111 · WI · Sussex

322 Bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 52 employers in Sussex, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Automated Packaging Systems - Garfield 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zim's Bagging-Main Plant 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR VILLA RICA NATIONAL (2) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDF Corporation 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABS IntelliGen 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE RHD Plumbing, Inc 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Milwaukee 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFC Gillett 333 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUSSEX WI 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DML2 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sussex IM, Inc. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCD Sussex 349 FTE
NAT-TCR Celsus Laboratories 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lancaster - PCA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bombardier Transportation - Plattsburgh 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S05973 - WM of AR TN AL KY Accounting Office 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE NAPP Lowell 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-Swy 0035 4205 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sales - Section 21 - Charlotte, NC 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sales - Section 31 - Indianapolis, IN 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.