Coil winding and cutting machinery, metalworking, manufacturing · Ohio

Automatic Feed Co.

Napoleon, OH · ~76 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automatic Feed Co. runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Coil winding and cutting machinery, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Automatic Feed Co.: 1.7 TCR = 51% of Coil winding and cutting machinery, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automatic Feed Co. safety composite

Automatic Feed Co. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Automatic Feed Co. injury rate improved

Automatic Feed Co.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333519 · Napoleon, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/19
  • PHOTO IMA Automation USA, …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IMA Automation USA, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Automatic Feed Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Automatic Feed Co. averages 1.7 TCR (51% of the Coil winding and cutting machinery, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Automatic Feed Co. TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=3 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Automatic Feed Co. falls in its industry

114 Coil winding and cutting machi establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 19 Coil winding and cutting machi employers in Ohio.

Automatic Feed Co. (76 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Automatic Feed Co.
Automatic Feed Co. (76 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Automatic Feed Co. has more employees than the Coil winding and cutting machinery, meta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2017 4.7 1.2 4 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333519 · OH · Napoleon

114 Coil winding and cutting machinery, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 51 employers in Napoleon, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IMA Automation USA, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primetals Technologies-Huger 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haumiller Engineering 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KWA - KUKA Systems N.A. LLC 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walleye Power LLC - Bay Shore Plant 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Transmission Svc Ctr 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 106-NiSource-Columbus OH-Manor Park 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worley Industrial Services at Lima Chemical 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Filling Homes 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Filling Memorial Home of Mercy, Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR JAC Products Inc. 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Napoleon Facility 269 FTE
NAT-TCR Angleton 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Perry Cook Plant 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Administration Building 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kotze Construction Co., Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilco Transport Kannapolis 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE F & S Building Innovations, Inc. 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hebron 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vancouver - BMD 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.