Coiled springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Illinois

Automatic Spring Coiling

Name: Automatic Spring Coiling Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Chicago, IL · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 10.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automatic Spring Coiling runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coiled springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Automatic Spring Coiling: 10.2 TCR = 308% of Coiled springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automatic Spring Coiling safety composite

Automatic Spring Coiling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 10.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers
DART rate: F 6.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2017

Automatic Spring Coiling injury rate improved

Automatic Spring Coiling's TCR fell 4.8 from 12.6 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.6 · 2017=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 308% of ind

DART 6.2 DART
RANK #16/17
PHOTO Spiller Spring
BOOK 2y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spiller Spring (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Triangle Suspe

10.4
This site

10.2
Spiller Spring

10.2
Conover Coils

10
Mubea Tailor R

9.9

What this shows Automatic Spring Coiling averages 10.2 TCR (308% of the Coiled springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Automatic Spring Coiling TCR series: 2016=12.6 · 2017=7.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Automatic Spring Coiling falls in its industry

189 Coiled springs, heavy gauge me establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 17 Coiled springs, heavy gauge me employers in Illinois.

Automatic Spring Coiling (54 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Automatic Spring Coiling has fewer employees than the Coiled springs, heavy gauge metal, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	7.8	6.2	4	1	0
2016	12.6	3.6	6	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · IL · Chicago

189 Coiled springs, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Spiller Spring	SHEBOYGAN, WI	10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Conover Coils	CONOVER, NC	10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Mubea Tailor Rolled Blanks	FLORENCE, KY	9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Triangle Suspension	DUBOIS, PA	10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Illinois Crop Improvement Association, Inc.	CHAMPAIGN	54 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Illinois Electric Cooperative	WINCHESTER	54 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Greenlink Energy Solutions, Inc.	ROCKFORD	54 FTE
STATE-SIZE	POINTCORE Construction, LLC	PEORIA	54 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Chicago Public Schools	Chicago	49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Chicago/Corporate	Chicago	18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Illinois at Chicago	Chicago	13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University Health Service UIC UIC Campus	Chicago	12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR	KWF Wesley Chapel, FL	Wesley Chapel, FL	10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Dubuque IA Depot	Peosta, IA	10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Truyu Clinic DeMers	Grand Forks, ND	10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Westfield/ SSL MA	Westfield, MA	10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Greece Ambulance	Rochester, NY	54 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Sweet Springs Inc	Sweet Springs, MO	54 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of California West LLC	California, MO	54 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Glasgow LLC	Glasgow, MO	54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.