Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, spider), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

Automotive Division of Indiana

Richmond, IN · ~152 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automotive Division of Indiana runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, spider), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Automotive Division of Indiana: 9.6 TCR = 177% of Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, spider), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automotive Division of Indiana safety composite

Automotive Division of Indiana scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 28% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

12/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2017→2023

Automotive Division of Indiana injury rate improved

Automotive Division of Indiana's TCR fell 11.6 from 16.7 in 2017 to 5.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.7 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=8.4 · 2023=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Richmond, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.6 · 177% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #40/41
  • PHOTO Versa-Tech Technolog…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Automotive Division of Indiana in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Automotive Division of Indiana averages 9.6 TCR (177% of the Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, spider), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Automotive Division of Indiana TCR series: 2017=16.7 · 2018=8 · 2019=8.4 · 2023=5.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Automotive Division of Indiana falls in its industry

320 Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, sp establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 41 Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, sp employers in Indiana.

Automotive Division of Indiana (152 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Automotive Division of Indiana
Automotive Division of Indiana (152 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Automotive Division of Indiana has fewer employees than the Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, spider), aut median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.1 2.5 7 1 0
2019 8.4 3.8 18 0 0
2018 8.0 4.8 15 0 1
2017 16.7 6.6 33 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · IN · Richmond

320 Gears (e.g., crown, pinion, spider), automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 131 employers in Richmond, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Production Saw & Machine 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transtar Industries 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thyssenkrupp Crankshaft Veedersburg Forge 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beaty Construction 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips and Jordan, Incorporated - AEP Master Agreement Sub Physical Security 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hostess Brands, LLC 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plymouth Food Service Packaging 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR City Of Richmond 535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Belden, Inc. 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1745 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1745 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Speedwaysg 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Laurel 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TCH Hale Ave 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Board of Child Care 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fm2 - Facilities Management 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eurofins EAG Agroscience LLC 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Chopper #6 - PC06 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE TASUS Texas Corp. 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.