Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Michigan

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC

Roseville, MI · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC: 9.6 TCR = 178% of Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC safety composite

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC: 3.7 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 18.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2019

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC's TCR rose 4.0 from 3.7 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Roseville, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.6 · 178% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #57/61
  • PHOTO Production Saw & Mac…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Production Saw & Machine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC averages 9.6 TCR (178% of the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=18.3 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=7.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC falls in its industry

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 61 Drive shafts and half shafts, employers in Michigan.

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC (41 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC
Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC (41 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Versa-Tech Technologies, LLC has fewer employees than the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.7 1.9 4 0 0
2018 8.8 4.4 4 0 0
2017 18.3 18.3 7 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · MI · Roseville

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 82 employers in Roseville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Production Saw & Machine 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Automotive Division of Indiana 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transtar Industries 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Otsego 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority - Service Center 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zolman Restoration, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nugent Builders, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4003 - TPG/PBM 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4002 - TPG/PBS (inc 4009) 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2959 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCO Engineering, Inc. 417 FTE
NAT-TCR SDF-LOUISVILLE 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lowell C. Hagen Trucking, Inc 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Chandler Estate, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rusk Rehabilitation Center 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dragon ESP Akron 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matson Timberland Lumber Co. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southeast Georgia Health System - Camden Campus 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE SFV 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.