Packaging machinery manufacturing · Puerto Rico

AutoPak Engineering Corporation

Name: AutoPak Engineering Corporation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Caguas, PR · ~39 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AutoPak Engineering Corporation runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

AutoPak Engineering Corporation: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AutoPak Engineering Corporation safety composite

AutoPak Engineering Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers
DART rate: F 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AutoPak Engineering Corporation: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2023

AutoPak Engineering Corporation's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Caguas, PR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

DART 2.2 DART
RANK P44
PHOTO RA Pearson Company
BOOK 7y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RA Pearson Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.6
RA Pearson Com

2.6
4174 Fort Wort

2.6
Latitude 36 Fo

2.6
E-PAK Machiner

2.6

What this shows AutoPak Engineering Corporation averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

AutoPak Engineering Corporation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where AutoPak Engineering Corporation falls in its industry

269 Packaging machinery manufactur establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

AutoPak Engineering Corporation (39 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

AutoPak Engineering Corporation has fewer employees than the Packaging machinery manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	2.2	2.2	1
2022	2.3	2.3	1
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	5.0	5.0	2
2019	5.2	5.2	2
2018	3.3	3.3	1
2016	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · PR · Caguas

269 Packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 130 employers in Caguas, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	RA Pearson Company	SPOKANE, WA	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	4174 Fort Worth Sheet Feeder	FORT WORTH, TX	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Latitude 36 Foods Salinas	SALINAS, CA	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	E-PAK Machinery	LA PORTE, IN	2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	LUMA, Caguas	CAGUAS	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	PLP Co.	BETHEL PARK	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Otis Elevator Company-Puerto Rico	SAN JUAN	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	TK Elevator Corp Puerto Rico	CANTANO	39 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HOSPITAL HIMA SAN PABLO.CAGUAS	Caguas	1,550 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 2449	Caguas	804 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2449	Caguas	641 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MJ CONSULTING & DEVELOPMENT, INC.	Caguas	604 FTE
NAT-TCR	Hanson Truss Components Inc.	Olivehurst, CA	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Tuttle Inc.	Friend, NE	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	R. M. Towill Corporation	Honolulu, HI	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Twin Oaks Industries, Inc.	Salina, KS	2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Joe Christensen, Inc.	Lincoln, NE	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Tomahawk Health Services	Tomahawk, WI	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cementex Products Inc	Burlington, NJ	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Berry Pallets, Inc	Waseca, MN	39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.