Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing · California

Hanson Truss Components Inc.

Olivehurst, CA · ~90 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hanson Truss Components Inc. runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Hanson Truss Components Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hanson Truss Components Inc. safety composite

Hanson Truss Components Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2023

Hanson Truss Components Inc. injury rate improved

Hanson Truss Components Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Olivehurst, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/20
  • PHOTO Nashville TN Truss
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nashville TN Truss (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hanson Truss Components Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hanson Truss Components Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hanson Truss Components Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=3 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Hanson Truss Components Inc. falls in its industry

421 Roof trusses, wood, manufactur establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 20 Roof trusses, wood, manufactur employers in California.

Hanson Truss Components Inc. (90 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hanson Truss Components Inc.
Hanson Truss Components Inc. (90 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Hanson Truss Components Inc. has more employees than the Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.4 1.6 3 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 5 1 0
2019 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · CA · Olivehurst

421 Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 21 employers in Olivehurst, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nashville TN Truss 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP 272 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rome Truss Plant 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP San Antonio LLC 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Davis West Research Station 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland America Flowers, LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hettinga - California 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE A & R Contracting 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 563 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 59 2,409 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 42 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAYUB - YUBA CITY 109 FTE
NAT-TCR AutoPak Engineering Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuttle Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR R. M. Towill Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin Oaks Industries, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Western Mountain Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 14 - Raleigh 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canam Steel Corporation, South Plainfield 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peninsula Improvement Corporation 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.