Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating · Puerto Rico

Autoridad de Energia Electrica

San Juan, PR · ~5,784 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Autoridad de Energia Electrica runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating workplace, earning a grade F.

Autoridad de Energia Electrica: 7.3 TCR = 227% of Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Autoridad de Energia Electrica safety composite

Autoridad de Energia Electrica scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2017→2021

Autoridad de Energia Electrica injury rate improved

Autoridad de Energia Electrica's TCR fell 9.3 from 11.8 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.8 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=9.0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926130 · San Juan, PR ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 227% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK P19
  • PHOTO City of Robbinsdale …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1,396 inj
  • SIZE ~5,784 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Robbinsdale - Public Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

Autoridad de Energia Electrica in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Autoridad de Energia Electrica averages 7.3 TCR (227% of the Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Autoridad de Energia Electrica TCR series: 2017=11.8 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Autoridad de Energia Electrica falls in its industry

43 Public utility (except transpo establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Autoridad de Energia Electrica (5,784 employees, TCR 7.3) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Autoridad de Energia Electrica
Autoridad de Energia Electrica (5,784 employees, TCR 7.3) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Autoridad de Energia Electrica has more employees than the Public utility (except transportation) c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 2.0 49 13 0
2020 2.8 2.3 112 12 0
2019 9.0 5.8 300 159 0
2018 10.2 6.5 413 187 0
2017 11.8 7.7 522 135 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926130 · PR · San Juan

43 Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 262 employers in San Juan, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Robbinsdale - Public Works 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro Water Resources 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rubidoux Community Services District 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Treatment Services 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tribunal de Justicia 5,096 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genesis Security - Regiones 4,698 FTE
STATE-SIZE Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico 4,195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amgen Manufacturing LTD - Puerto Rico 2,955 FTE
CITY-NEAR Policia de Puerto Rico 13,672 FTE
CITY-NEAR MANGUAL OFFICE CLEANING 2,363 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOSPITAL AUXILIO MUTUO 2,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Sciences Campus 2,104 FTE
NAT-TCR Memorial Medical Nursing Center 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sartori Whey 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McRae Industries Footwear Finishing / Shipping 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR C.Q. Insulation, Inc. #732 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA) 5,792 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Merchandisers, LLC 5,798 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.