Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating · California

Rubidoux Community Services District

Jurupa Valley, CA · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rubidoux Community Services District runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating workplace, earning a grade F.

Rubidoux Community Services District: 6.8 TCR = 214% of Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rubidoux Community Services District safety composite

Rubidoux Community Services District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rubidoux Community Services District: 9.6 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Rubidoux Community Services District's TCR rose 2.8 from 9.6 in 2019 to 12.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926130 · Jurupa Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 214% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO City of Greensboro W…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Greensboro Water Resources (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rubidoux Community Services District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rubidoux Community Services District averages 6.8 TCR (214% of the Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rubidoux Community Services District TCR series: 2019=9.6 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=12.2 · 2024=12.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Rubidoux Community Services District falls in its industry

43 Public utility (except transpo establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Public utility (except transpo employers in California.

Rubidoux Community Services District (26 employees, TCR 6.8) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rubidoux Community Services District
Rubidoux Community Services District (26 employees, TCR 6.8) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Rubidoux Community Services District has fewer employees than the Public utility (except transportation) c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.4 0.0 3 0 0
2023 12.2 12.2 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.6 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926130 · CA · Jurupa Valley

43 Public utility (except transportation) commissions, nonoperating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 49 employers in Jurupa Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro Water Resources 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Robbinsdale - Public Works 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autoridad de Energia Electrica 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newport News Public Works 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jurupa Valley Terminal 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ONT1 776 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jurupa Valley, CA (Walmart) 432 476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUR7 303 FTE
NAT-TCR Battistoni Italian Specialty Meats 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington Court House OH 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holistic Farms LLC 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FORJAK Industrial 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seneca Foods - Berlin 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.R. Wolfe Heating Corp. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koeze Company 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Basin I&E Inc. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.