Nursing homes · North Carolina

Autumn Care of Salisbury

Salisbury, NC · ~130 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Autumn Care of Salisbury runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Autumn Care of Salisbury: 14.7 TCR = 226% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Autumn Care of Salisbury safety composite

Autumn Care of Salisbury scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2024

Autumn Care of Salisbury injury rate improved

Autumn Care of Salisbury's TCR fell 2.8 from 5.9 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4169.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=29.6 · 2022=4169.1 · 2023=46.5 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Salisbury, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.7 · 226% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #462/510
  • PHOTO Pendleton Health and…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 124 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Autumn Care of Salisbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Autumn Care of Salisbury averages 14.7 TCR (226% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Autumn Care of Salisbury TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=4.2 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=29.6 · 2022=4169.1 · 2023=46.5 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Autumn Care of Salisbury falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #462 safest of 510 Nursing homes employers in North Carolina.

Autumn Care of Salisbury (130 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Autumn Care of Salisbury
Autumn Care of Salisbury (130 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Autumn Care of Salisbury has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 2.0 3 0 0
2023 46.5 46.5 1 39 0
2022 4169.1 4169.1 70 0 0
2021 29.6 29.6 27 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 4 0 0
2017 12.3 8.2 12 0 0
2016 5.9 5.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Salisbury

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 180 employers in Salisbury, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harper Mills 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Juliette Manor 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Estates at Excelsior 14.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Starr Electric Company, Inc Raleigh 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bonitz Flooring and Contracting Charlotte 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP Oral Finished Products 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC Johnson Professional - Corporate office and sales 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSCEXC 1,314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Rowan Medical Center 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rowan County Government 1,151 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLT1 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon DHX4 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nies Foundations, Inc. 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Level Up Logistics 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Norton King's Daughters' Health Rehabilitation Center, Home Health, Hospice 14.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE B. Frank Joy LLC 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salina Ks - 3279 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faribault Grow Out 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE SC140 Prosperity Sawmill 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.