Skilled nursing facilities · Connecticut

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center

Mystic, CT · ~141 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center: 14.7 TCR = 226% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center: 7.1 → 23.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 35.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.55× in 2021

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 16.8 from 7.1 in 2016 to 23.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 35.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mystic, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.7 · 226% of ind

  • DART 22.7 DART
  • RANK #194/258
  • PHOTO Autumn Care of Salis…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Autumn Care of Salisbury (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 14.7 TCR (226% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=12.9 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=35.3 · 2021=23.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #194 safest of 258 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Connecticut.

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center (141 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center
Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center (141 employees, TCR 14.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Pendleton Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 23.9 22.7 8 12 0
2020 35.3 34.3 12 23 0
2019 4.9 3.0 5 0 0
2018 3.9 2.9 4 0 0
2017 12.9 9.2 14 0 0
2016 7.1 6.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Mystic

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 28 employers in Mystic, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Autumn Care of Salisbury 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harper Mills 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Juliette Manor 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Estates at Excelsior 14.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Cheshire 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ferguson Mechanical 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norgren Inc. 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE CT112 HAYDON KERK 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mystic Aquarium/Ocean Blue Catering 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR StoneRidge Senior Care, LLC 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mystic Seaport Museum 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mystic Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center 150 FTE
NAT-TCR Anthem Burr Ridge Management, LLC 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Volpi Foods Quattro 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 351008-Bfl-Westside Sta 14.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Azalea Trace 14.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Touchmark at Coffee Creek LLC 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Metals LLC 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tarzana Health and Rehabilitation Center 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pheasants Forever, Inc 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.