Skilled nursing facilities · Washington

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park

Vancouver, WA · ~127 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park: 17.5 TCR = 270% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park safety composite

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park: 6.3 → 17.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 28.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2021

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park's TCR rose 11.6 from 6.3 in 2019 to 17.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 28.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Vancouver, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.5 · 270% of ind

  • DART 16.9 DART
  • RANK #163/190
  • PHOTO MHCNC, Inc. dba Care…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MHCNC, Inc. dba Care Manor Nursing and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park averages 17.5 TCR (270% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park TCR series: 2019=6.3 · 2020=28.4 · 2021=17.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #163 safest of 190 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Washington.

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park (127 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park
Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park (127 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 17.9 16.9 8 10 0
2020 28.4 26.3 7 20 0
2019 6.3 4.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WA · Vancouver

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 490 employers in Vancouver, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MHCNC, Inc. dba Care Manor Nursing and Rehab 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comer Health and Rehabilitation 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bartels Lutheran Retirement Community 17.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Crossing 17.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Duvall, WA 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCI:CC019 - CC019-Snohomish, WA Office 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Solutions 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Enterprises LLC 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Senior Living 3,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwest Medical Center Main Campus 3,464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL600 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR 600 1,922 FTE
NAT-TCR ATL - Ground Ops 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HG314 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR BG's Value Market 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR D5 Champaign Yard 17.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shore Acres Care Center 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLARO / PRT - Ponce CO 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial City Health and Rehabilitation Center 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.