Nursing homes · Maryland

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home

Baltimore, MD · ~127 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home runs at 350% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home: 22.8 TCR = 350% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home safety composite

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.4

2017→2021

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home injury rate improved

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home's TCR fell 12.4 from 24.5 in 2017 to 12.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 33.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=24.5 · 2018=33.3 · 2019=28.3 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=12.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Baltimore, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 22.8 · 350% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #170/176
  • PHOTO SCRANTON HEALTHCARE …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 105 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCRANTON HEALTHCARE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home averages 22.8 TCR (350% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home TCR series: 2017=24.5 · 2018=33.3 · 2019=28.3 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=12.1 · BLS 6.5

Where St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #170 safest of 176 Nursing homes employers in Maryland.

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home (127 employees, TCR 22.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home
St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home (127 employees, TCR 22.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

St. Elizabeth Rehabilitation and Nursing Home has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.1 1.5 8 0 0
2020 15.7 7.5 14 5 0
2019 28.3 4.2 27 0 0
2018 33.3 13.1 32 1 0
2017 24.5 7.1 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MD · Baltimore

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCRANTON HEALTHCARE CENTER 22.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burton Health Care Center 22.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olympia Convalescent Hospital 22.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nodaway Nursing Home 22.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northwest Station 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&M Welding - Mount Airy 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mechanical Engineering & Construction Corporation-MD 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kelly Foods Corporation 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Scranton Healthcare Center 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR City of New Britain 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ARCA Neuro Rehabilitation - Galaxia Park NW 22.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shore Acres Care Center 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frontier Rehab & Extended Care Center 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLARO / PRT - Ponce CO 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.