Skilled nursing facilities · Oregon

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City

Junction City, OR · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City: 11.0 TCR = 170% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City safety composite

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City: 6.8 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 21.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2020

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City's TCR rose 2.0 from 6.8 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 21.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Junction City, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.0 · 170% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #86/125
  • PHOTO Craighead Nursing Ce…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Craighead Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City averages 11.0 TCR (170% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=21.4 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=8.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 125 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Oregon.

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City (61 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City
Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City (61 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.8 6.6 4 0 0
2019 13.2 8.8 5 1 0
2018 4.9 2.4 2 0 0
2017 21.4 15.3 7 0 0
2016 6.8 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OR · Junction City

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 23 employers in Junction City, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Craighead Nursing Center 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marysville Care Center 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Neck Senior Care Community 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alden Estates of Naperville 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cherry Valley Orchard, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Creek Gardens, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lebanon 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horizon Forestry, LLC 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Junction City Campus 403 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guaranty RV 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0019-0019-00386 FAC-00386-JUNCTION CITY-OR 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-00386 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Spee-Dee Delivery Service, Inc. - Milwaukee 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Range of California 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rumford Community Home 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR IFS Coatings, Inc. (Oklahoma) 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Siegel Group, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE RIS - Residence Inn Downtown Raleigh 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fountain Park Assisted Living and Memory Care 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buford Thompson Company Fort Worth 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.