Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Avanti Senior living Vision Park

Shenandoah, TX · ~62 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avanti Senior living Vision Park runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Avanti Senior living Vision Park: 3.3 TCR = 88% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avanti Senior living Vision Park safety composite

Avanti Senior living Vision Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Avanti Senior living Vision Park held a steady TCR band

Avanti Senior living Vision Park's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Shenandoah, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 88% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #91/470
  • PHOTO TSL Curry Manor, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TSL Curry Manor, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Avanti Senior living Vision Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avanti Senior living Vision Park averages 3.3 TCR (88% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avanti Senior living Vision Park TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Avanti Senior living Vision Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Avanti Senior living Vision Park (62 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Avanti Senior living Vision Park
Avanti Senior living Vision Park (62 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Avanti Senior living Vision Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.0 0.0 3 0 0
2022 7.4 7.4 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Shenandoah

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 17 employers in Shenandoah, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TSL Curry Manor, LLC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest Oaks of Spring Hill 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fern Terrace of Mayfield 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kasey Paige Assisted Living 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE EP Energy - Eagle Ford (Dilley) 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Dog Drilling 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koserca Headquearters 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monahans 2790 South Wilma, Monahans, TX 79756 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Eye Associates (WLD) 630 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4713 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4713 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHHS-WOODLANDS HOSP 134 FTE
NAT-TCR Bedford Paper, INC 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Advance Auto Parts DC 02 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Granada Hills RC 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Muth & Company Roofing, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rtl Electric Company, Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blazer Boats 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 551 Eagle Grove 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 850 Spirit Lake 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.