Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing · Arizona

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale)

Glendale, AZ · ~350 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale): 11.4 TCR = 346% of Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) safety composite

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2019→2021

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) injury rate improved

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale)'s TCR fell 6.7 from 14.6 in 2019 to 7.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.6 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Glendale, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 346% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #29/30
  • PHOTO Den Hartog Industries
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 110 inj
  • SIZE ~350 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Den Hartog Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) averages 11.4 TCR (346% of the Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) TCR series: 2019=14.6 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=7.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) falls in its industry

2,838 Windows and window frames, pla establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 30 Windows and window frames, pla employers in Arizona.

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) (350 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale)
Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) (350 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Avanti Windows & Doors (Glendale) has more employees than the Windows and window frames, plastics, man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.9 2.9 36 0 0
2020 11.8 5.6 44 0 0
2019 14.6 6.0 30 14 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · AZ · Glendale

2,838 Windows and window frames, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 313 employers in Glendale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Den Hartog Industries 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technical Industries, Inc. 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whitehead Composite Industries, LLC 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cordova Outdoors 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frito Lay - Casa Grande 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hayden Operations 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ultra Clean Technology - Chandler 350 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3Harris Technologies 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR 730 ABRAZO ARROWHEAD CAMPUS 1,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glendale Elementary School District 1,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-730 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-515 910 FTE
NAT-TCR 1353 - Loves Park Il Whse 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Anaheim Memorial Med Ctr - Hsk 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Safety 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Buckeye Diamond Logistics - Lakeland 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE TH Foods, Inc. - Loves Park 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABB Inc. 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Lubbock Isd-Custodial 350 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4450 10th Ave SE 350 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.