Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · Texas

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC

Fort Worth, TX · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC: 2.3 TCR = 71% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC safety composite

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2019→2024

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC injury rate improved

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC's TCR fell 1.8 from 3.3 in 2019 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.3 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/29
  • PHOTO Greene Tweed and Com…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greene Tweed and Company Kulpsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC averages 2.3 TCR (71% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC TCR series: 2019=3.3 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 29 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in Texas.

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC (79 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC
Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC (79 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Aviation Devices & Electronic Components LLC has fewer employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · TX · Fort Worth

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greene Tweed and Company Kulpsville 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ILPEA Industries - Hartselle 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Crane Cerritos 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE HOOPER TRUCKING LTD 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fervo Energy 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lipan Service center 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Office 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR YKK AP America - Cincinnati, Ohio Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR D&B Cousins Construction Corp 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hermanson - Fab Shop 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Planning and Development 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE C.J. Mushroom Co., LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willmar 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sauk Rapids 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE EcoDry Restoration of Arizona 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.