Executive and legislative office combinations · North Carolina

Planning and Development

Concord, NC · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Planning and Development runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade B.

Planning and Development: 2.3 TCR = 73% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Planning and Development safety composite

Planning and Development scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 55%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Planning and Development: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Planning and Development's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Concord, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/34
  • PHOTO The State of Vermont
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The State of Vermont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Planning and Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Planning and Development averages 2.3 TCR (73% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Planning and Development TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.2

Where Planning and Development falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 34 Executive and legislative offi employers in North Carolina.

Planning and Development (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Planning and Development
Planning and Development (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Planning and Development has fewer employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.8 2.3 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 6.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · NC · Concord

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The State of Vermont 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jasper County Government 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legislative 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin Township 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrells Facility 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buck Steam Station 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE KITTY HAWK AREA 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR D&B Cousins Construction Corp 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR YKK AP America - Cincinnati, Ohio Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hermanson - Fab Shop 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Innovex Downhole Solutions Midland OH 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bohemia 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Segovia Produce LTD 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1282 PYP Sante Fe Spring 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Augusta Pines 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.