Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) · North Carolina

Aviation Operations

Concord, NC · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aviation Operations runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) workplace, earning a grade C.

Aviation Operations: 5.4 TCR = 120% of Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aviation Operations safety composite

Aviation Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2016→2021

Aviation Operations injury rate improved

Aviation Operations's TCR fell 10.5 from 13.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.4 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/52
  • PHOTO Sheltair Aviation ORL
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sheltair Aviation ORL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Aviation Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aviation Operations averages 5.4 TCR (120% of the Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aviation Operations TCR series: 2016=13 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Aviation Operations falls in its industry

1,555 Airport operators (e.g., civil establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 52 Airport operators (e.g., civil employers in North Carolina.

Aviation Operations (41 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Aviation Operations
Aviation Operations (41 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Aviation Operations has fewer employees than the Airport operators (e.g., civil, internat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2018 8.2 5.5 2 1 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2016 13.0 13.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NC · Concord

1,555 Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sheltair Aviation ORL 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001252 BNA - 252 NASHVILLE INTL AIRPORT 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AKERI - ANCHORAGE CENTER/CUSTOMS GATEWAY 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GAT - PAPHL 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Barnes LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sandhill Turf 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewiston NC Operation 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hendersonville Operations Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR Great Northern Cabinetry, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Battery 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Skiff LLC. 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Waypoint Logistics East 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE FedEx Office Los Angeles CA Manufacturing 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Office Memphis TN CPC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Karr Transportation 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soft Stuff 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.