General Warehousing and Storage · North Carolina

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3

Concord, NC · ~1,263 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3: 6.0 TCR = 104% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 safety composite

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2018→2020

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 injury rate improved

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3's TCR fell 1.2 from 6.5 in 2018 to 5.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 6.0 · 104% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #265/330
  • PHOTO TN Warehouse
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 166 inj
  • SIZE ~1,263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TN Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 averages 6.0 TCR (104% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 TCR series: 2018=6.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=5.3 · BLS 5.8

Where North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #265 safest of 330 General Warehousing and Storag employers in North Carolina.

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 (1,263 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3
North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 (1,263 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.3 4.9 66 8 0
2019 6.2 6.1 74 1 0
2018 6.5 5.8 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Concord

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TN Warehouse 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0171 - SUMNER WA (DRY) DEPOT 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald 2650 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DEW4 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coty US LLC 1,264 FTE
STATE-SIZE BSH Home Appliance Corp 1,266 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daimler Trucks North America - Mt. Holly Plant 1,266 FTE
STATE-SIZE HAECO Airframe Services - Greensboro 1,266 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : CLT5 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Amzl : Dew4 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New Martinsville Center 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arctic Insulation & Manufacturing, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Statewide Towing & Recovery, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Line HealthCare 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE HMAPF01 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX - Irving - 2304 Century Center Blvd - The American Bottling Company 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAS-National Aerospace Solutions at AEDC 1,263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.