Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers · Illinois

Avnet Chicago US34H

Chicago, IL · ~173 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avnet Chicago US34H runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Avnet Chicago US34H: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avnet Chicago US34H safety composite

Avnet Chicago US34H scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Avnet Chicago US34H held a steady TCR band

Avnet Chicago US34H's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423690 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Avnet Corporate USFR
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avnet Corporate USFR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Avnet Chicago US34H in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avnet Chicago US34H averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avnet Chicago US34H TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Avnet Chicago US34H falls in its industry

155 Other Electronic Parts and Equ establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Other Electronic Parts and Equ employers in Illinois.

Avnet Chicago US34H (173 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Avnet Chicago US34H
Avnet Chicago US34H (173 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Avnet Chicago US34H has more employees than the Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Mer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423690 · IL · Chicago

155 Other Electronic Parts and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avnet Corporate USFR 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4028-C302 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omron Electronics, LLC (OEI) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4028-AEP28 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NTI National Technologies 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hill & Valley, Inc. 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake County Press 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Plastics 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Sherwood Aviation 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Grandway West Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chalmette Refining, L.L.C. 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kerry Beloit 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Melhorn Sales Service and Trucking 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flowers Baking Company of Houston, LLC 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reale Construction Co.,Inc 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.