Food Service Contractors · Arizona

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit

Phoenix, AZ · ~173 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit: 2.1 TCR = 70% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit safety composite

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit: 1.6 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit's TCR rose 4.2 from 1.6 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/152
  • PHOTO WBG IFC Building
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~173 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WBG IFC Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit averages 2.1 TCR (70% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2018=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.0

Where Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 152 Food Service Contractors employers in Arizona.

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit (173 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit
Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit (173 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Sodexo at Grand Canyon University Habit has more employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AZ · Phoenix

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WBG IFC Building 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nanticoke Health Services 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Health Care 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LIBERTY- BRIGHTMORE 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SALT RIVER PROJECT CORONADO GENERATING STATION 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Streams 4 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE SDB, Inc. Intel Ocotillo, Chandler 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Power Constructors 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR M&M Steel Erection Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR V.I. Water & Power Authority Richmond Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifespan Physicians Group, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR I L Long Construction Co., Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Flowers Baking Company of Houston, LLC 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE WinStar Farm, LLC 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1108 - NSM Cedar Hills 173 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avnet Chicago US34H 173 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.