Roofing contractors · Ohio

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office

Milford, OH · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office: 2.2 TCR = 79% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office safety composite

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2021

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office injury rate improved

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Milford, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/86
  • PHOTO Monahan & Loughlin
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monahan & Loughlin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office averages 2.2 TCR (79% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 86 Roofing contractors employers in Ohio.

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office (32 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office
A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office (32 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

A.W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cincinnati Office has fewer employees than the Roofing contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2019 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · OH · Milford

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 66 employers in Milford, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monahan & Loughlin 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Finger Lakes Roofing Co,;Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR F.J. Dahill Co., Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garcia Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Custom Agri Systems - Upper Sandusky 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tiffin Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaware Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Electric, Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR M Construction Group, LLC 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edison 382 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5499 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5499 259 FTE
NAT-TCR Lafayette Subaru 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JX Truck Center Grand Rapids 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DMS - Shreveport 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JJS Transportation & Distribution Co. Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pulaski Contract #2 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Gardens of Rose Hill 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE CL Coatings, Inc - California 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Power Line Supply Commerce 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.