Construction management, power and communication transmission line · Michigan

Power Line Supply Commerce

Reed City, MI · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Power Line Supply Commerce runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade A.

Power Line Supply Commerce: 0.5 TCR = 19% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Power Line Supply Commerce safety composite

Power Line Supply Commerce scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Power Line Supply Commerce held a steady TCR band

Power Line Supply Commerce's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Reed City, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/54
  • PHOTO VIKOR
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VIKOR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Power Line Supply Commerce in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Power Line Supply Commerce averages 0.5 TCR (19% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Power Line Supply Commerce TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Power Line Supply Commerce falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 54 Construction management, power employers in Michigan.

Power Line Supply Commerce (32 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Power Line Supply Commerce
Power Line Supply Commerce (32 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Power Line Supply Commerce has fewer employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MI · Reed City

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 32 employers in Reed City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VIKOR 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FPL Caloosahatchee Solar NEE 22145012 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powertown Line Construction 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shakopee 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6801_15743 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Soil Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berrybrook 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tawas 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Supply & Construction Company - ALL 1,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company 821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hydaker-Wheatlake - Michigan Statewide 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Mills Yoplait Reed City 413 FTE
NAT-TCR Shell Catalysts & Technologies - Pittsburg 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Forum Energy Technologies - Stafford 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Rebar Napa 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR K177-M001 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4769-994-Pottery Barn 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-821-Pottery Barn 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-651-Pottery Barn 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pulaski Contract #2 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.