General-line groceries merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility

St. Cloud, MN · ~128 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility runs at 795% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General-line groceries merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility: 17.5 TCR = 795% of General-line groceries merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility safety composite

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 34.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility: 7.6 → 36.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 36.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.98× in 2024

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility's TCR rose 29.0 from 7.6 in 2022 to 36.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424410 · St. Cloud, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.5 · 795% of ind

  • DART 34.6 DART
  • RANK #34/38
  • PHOTO Jetro Cash and Carry…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jetro Cash and Carry 122 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility averages 17.5 TCR (795% of the General-line groceries merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility TCR series: 2022=7.6 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=36.6 · BLS 2.2

Where AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility falls in its industry

1,651 General-line groceries merchan establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 38 General-line groceries merchan employers in Minnesota.

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility (128 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility
AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility (128 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1

AWG, St. Cloud - Perishable Facility has fewer employees than the General-line groceries merchant wholesal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 36.6 34.6 37 0 0
2023 8.3 7.0 13 0 0
2022 7.6 7.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424410 · MN · St. Cloud

1,651 General-line groceries merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 130 employers in St. Cloud, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jetro Cash and Carry 122 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 24 - Mason City 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 84 - Fairfield 17.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Met-Con Construction 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Flexible Corporation 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pace Industries, St. Paul Division 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4039-02834000-00W002 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare St. Cloud Hospital 4,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud Hospital 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Cloud State University 1,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare Health Plaza 928 FTE
NAT-TCR Four Corners Gin Inc. Co. 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dtf Prep LLC 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DWA5 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodmark LLC 17.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 1830 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Clinton 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maserati Tampa 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyundai of Fort Myers 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.