Messenger service · Minnesota

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN

Little Canada, MN · ~128 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Messenger service workplace, earning a grade D.

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN: 8.5 TCR = 188% of Messenger service BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN safety composite

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 8.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.6

2017→2024

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN injury rate improved

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN's TCR fell 20.6 from 24.0 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 24.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=24.0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Little Canada, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 188% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #7/37
  • PHOTO Urban Partner Logist…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Urban Partner Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quicksilver Express Courier of MN averages 8.5 TCR (188% of the Messenger service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN TCR series: 2017=24 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Quicksilver Express Courier of MN falls in its industry

1,452 Messenger service establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 37 Messenger service employers in Minnesota.

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN (128 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Quicksilver Express Courier of MN
Quicksilver Express Courier of MN (128 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Quicksilver Express Courier of MN has more employees than the Messenger service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.3 3 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2022 8.7 6.8 9 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 4 0 0
2020 7.5 5.7 8 0 0
2019 9.7 8.8 10 0 0
2018 7.4 6.5 8 0 0
2017 24.0 23.0 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · MN · Little Canada

1,452 Messenger service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 35 employers in Little Canada, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Urban Partner Logistics LLC 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR On Point Logistics, LLC 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZWPH 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAU7 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Met-Con Construction 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Flexible Corporation 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pace Industries, St. Paul Division 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4039-02834000-00W002 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR Q3 Contracting 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN St. Paul 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bix Produce 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aquarius Water Conditioning, Inc 183 FTE
NAT-TCR 54th St Enid Plant 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northampton Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR United National Maintenance Inc Nevada Location 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mayer Malbin 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE H.G. Fenton Company 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Critz, Inc. 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Athens 047 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Collins Electric Company, Inc. 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.