Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing · West Virginia

AWP-Pellets

Kingwood, WV · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AWP-Pellets runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

AWP-Pellets: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AWP-Pellets safety composite

AWP-Pellets scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2017→2023

AWP-Pellets injury rate improved

AWP-Pellets's TCR fell 10.1 from 10.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321999 · Kingwood, WV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/15
  • PHOTO Cherry Creek Woodcraft
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cherry Creek Woodcraft (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

AWP-Pellets in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AWP-Pellets averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AWP-Pellets TCR series: 2017=10.1 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where AWP-Pellets falls in its industry

405 Pressed logs of sawdust and ot establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to West Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 15 Pressed logs of sawdust and ot employers in West Virginia.

AWP-Pellets (23 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AWP-Pellets
AWP-Pellets (23 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

AWP-Pellets has fewer employees than the Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood p median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 0.0 0 1 0
2021 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.1 5.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321999 · WV · Kingwood

405 Pressed logs of sawdust and other wood particles, nonpetroleum binder, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 11 employers in Kingwood, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cherry Creek Woodcraft 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seneca Cabinets 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laminate Technologies Texas 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GrillWorks Inc 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrison Rural Electricification Association, Inc 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAVISSON RUN AREA 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan Hill 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALL Concrete Inc 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Preston Memorial Hospital 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4372 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4372 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Preston Contractors 185 FTE
NAT-TCR JFK International Airport 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Building Products LAXC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Behavioral Health Services, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sidney EMS - Ohio 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harbor View Assisted Living 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Muscatine Bakery Feeds 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE ProWall 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Round Lake Park IL 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.