Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

Harbor View Assisted Living

Manitowoc, WI · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harbor View Assisted Living runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Harbor View Assisted Living: 8.3 TCR = 220% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harbor View Assisted Living safety composite

Harbor View Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Harbor View Assisted Living: 7.3 → 20.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 20.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.41× in 2023

Harbor View Assisted Living's TCR rose 12.8 from 7.3 in 2016 to 20.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Manitowoc, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 220% of ind

  • DART 20.1 DART
  • RANK #196/273
  • PHOTO The Cambridge Homes
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Cambridge Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Harbor View Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harbor View Assisted Living averages 8.3 TCR (220% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harbor View Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=6 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=20.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Harbor View Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #196 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Harbor View Assisted Living (23 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Harbor View Assisted Living
Harbor View Assisted Living (23 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Harbor View Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 20.1 20.1 3 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2021 11.3 11.3 2 0 0
2020 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 11.1 5.5 2 0 0
2018 6.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.3 7.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Manitowoc

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 116 employers in Manitowoc, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Cambridge Homes 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Cottagewood Buffalo MC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Mountain House 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Ivy at Golden Gate 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE W3855 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Badger Unified Cooperative Services 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 768 New Richmond Agronomy 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE 079 Evansville Agronomy 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Family Memorial Medical Center 1,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Manitowoc 629 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Family Medical Center 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal-Mogul Powertrain Systems, LLC, dba Tenneco 462 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #536 UNION PARK, FL 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NurseCore of Santa Maria 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Young Men's Christian Association of High Point, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR KPC Promise Hospital of Wichita Falls 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE AWP-Pellets 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE ProWall 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Round Lake Park IL 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ypsilanti MI 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.