Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC

Tyler, TX · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC: 1.8 TCR = 48% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC safety composite

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2023 to 3.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tyler, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 48% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #31/470
  • PHOTO From The Heart
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: From The Heart (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC averages 1.8 TCR (48% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC (32 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC
Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC (32 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Tyler

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 357 employers in Tyler, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR From The Heart 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Shore Commons 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood Estates 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carmel Place 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heifer Ranch at Arroyo Seco, LTD 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Coyote Ranch 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Tulia 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feather Crest Farm 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler - CTMF 380 3,897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tyler Main Hospital 2,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Tyler,TX-USA 2,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinity Clinic - CTMF 381 1,705 FTE
NAT-TCR Advantage Controls, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Davidson Plyforms 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harter's Quick Clean up 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE St Marys Box Company Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE ConceptWorks Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bloomington 10241 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson 10225 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.