Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Lake Shore Commons

Wilmington, NC · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lake Shore Commons runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Lake Shore Commons: 1.8 TCR = 48% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lake Shore Commons safety composite

Lake Shore Commons scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lake Shore Commons held a steady TCR band

Lake Shore Commons's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Wilmington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/356
  • PHOTO Azalea Trails AL MC …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lake Shore Commons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lake Shore Commons averages 1.8 TCR (48% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lake Shore Commons TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lake Shore Commons falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Lake Shore Commons (26 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lake Shore Commons
Lake Shore Commons (26 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lake Shore Commons has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Wilmington

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 360 employers in Wilmington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Azalea Trails AL MC Care Properties, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR From The Heart 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood Estates 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carmel Place 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yarbrough Farms LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH LNM- EST 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center 6,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover Regional Medical Center 4,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover County Government 1,974 FTE
NAT-TCR Weeks Marine 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brentwood Estates 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Wisconsin Management Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairport Site 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lake Ridge Village 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakewood Estates 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca - Pearland Medical 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rh Latham 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.