Meal, corn, for human consumption made in flour mills · Indiana

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant

Evansville, IN · ~343 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Meal, corn, for human consumption made in flour mills workplace, earning a grade D.

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant: 4.1 TCR = 124% of Meal, corn, for human consumption made in flour mills BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant safety composite

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant held a steady TCR band

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.2 in 2018 to 5.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311211 · Evansville, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 124% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO Azteca Milling, L.P.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~343 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Azteca Milling, L.P. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant averages 4.1 TCR (124% of the Meal, corn, for human consumption made in flour mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant TCR series: 2018=5.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant falls in its industry

209 Meal, corn, for human consumpt establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Meal, corn, for human consumpt employers in Indiana.

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant (343 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant
Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant (343 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Azteca Milling, L.P. Evansville Plant has more employees than the Meal, corn, for human consumption made i median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.5 4.9 18 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 8 0 0
2021 3.3 3.0 11 0 0
2018 5.2 4.9 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311211 · IN · Evansville

209 Meal, corn, for human consumption made in flour mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 489 employers in Evansville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Azteca Milling, L.P. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardent Mills Stockton 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grain Craft McPherson KS 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muleshoe TX 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2691 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1263 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE 175 951 - GEO EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE-NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schererville 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Midtown 3,068 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global - Evansville, IN (Oakley Str.) 2,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 2,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBC Merchants, LLC 1,859 FTE
NAT-TCR Heitkamp Masonry, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Harlow's School Bus Service of Montana - Libby 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Lodge at Woodloch 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6899 Steger 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE WA018 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunharbor Manor 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leopardo Companies, Inc. 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schweitzer Mountain Resort 343 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.