Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Texas

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat

Crowley, TX · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat runs at 285% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat: 9.4 TCR = 285% of Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat safety composite

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.9

2018→2023

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat injury rate improved

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat's TCR fell 19.9 from 28.5 in 2018 to 8.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 28.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=28.5 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Crowley, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 285% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #67/69
  • PHOTO Southwest Galvanizing
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southwest Galvanizing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AZZ Crowley Powder Coat averages 9.4 TCR (285% of the Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat TCR series: 2018=28.5 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.6 · BLS 3.3

Where AZZ Crowley Powder Coat falls in its industry

646 Galvanizing metals and metal p establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 69 Galvanizing metals and metal p employers in Texas.

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat (29 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AZZ Crowley Powder Coat
AZZ Crowley Powder Coat (29 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

AZZ Crowley Powder Coat has fewer employees than the Galvanizing metals and metal products fo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2019 11.9 5.9 2 0 0
2018 28.5 17.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · TX · Crowley

646 Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 17 employers in Crowley, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southwest Galvanizing 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc - Wixom 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reifel Industries Inc 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC Coaters 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Powerhouse Retail Services, LLC 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Championx / Harbison-Fischer 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harbison-Fischer 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3631 337 FTE
NAT-TCR Human Services Programs of Carroll County, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Walden 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carthage Dirt Cheap 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR August Schell Brewing Co 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE J & F Construction Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summerwinds Cupertino 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Castle Power Plant 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cotton Gin 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.