Commercial building construction general contractors · Ohio

J & F Construction Inc

Bucyrus, OH · ~29 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J & F Construction Inc runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

J & F Construction Inc: 2.3 TCR = 79% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J & F Construction Inc safety composite

J & F Construction Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2023

J & F Construction Inc injury rate improved

J & F Construction Inc's TCR fell 6.7 from 6.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Bucyrus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #117/220
  • PHOTO 1014 - BELFOR Atlant…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1014 - BELFOR Atlanta GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

J & F Construction Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J & F Construction Inc averages 2.3 TCR (79% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J & F Construction Inc TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where J & F Construction Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 220 Commercial building constructi employers in Ohio.

J & F Construction Inc (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate J & F Construction Inc
J & F Construction Inc (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

J & F Construction Inc has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.7 6.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OH · Bucyrus

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 43 employers in Bucyrus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1014 - BELFOR Atlanta GA 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGM-Tennessee 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pavarini McGovern LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Banes General Contractors, Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Union City Facility 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Breeder Division Field Office 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plibrico Refractories LLC - Oak Hill 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanging Rock Energy Facility 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR IB Tech 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bucyrus Community Hospital 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bucyrus 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legacy Lighting : Bucyrus, OH 351 FTE
NAT-TCR West Michigan Branch 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 012q - Jupiter Regional Cost Center Fl Rntl 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Office 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Operations - Washington, IL 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE AZZ Crowley Powder Coat 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summerwinds Cupertino 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Castle Power Plant 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cotton Gin 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.