Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade · Indiana

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton

Hamilton, IN · ~71 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton: 5.8 TCR = 177% of Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton safety composite

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2017→2024

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton injury rate improved

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton's TCR fell 8.5 from 10.5 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.5 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=10.0 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Hamilton, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 177% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/32
  • PHOTO Quality Paint & Coat…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Paint & Coatings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton averages 5.8 TCR (177% of the Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton TCR series: 2017=10.5 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=10 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton falls in its industry

646 Bonderizing metal and metal pr establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 32 Bonderizing metal and metal pr employers in Indiana.

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton (71 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton
AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton (71 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton has more employees than the Bonderizing metal and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 4 0 0
2022 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2020 8.8 5.0 7 0 0
2019 10.0 10.0 8 0 0
2018 6.7 4.4 6 0 0
2017 10.5 7.9 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · IN · Hamilton

646 Bonderizing metal and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 6 employers in Hamilton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Paint & Coatings 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR C Nelson Enterprises 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1 Pheasant Run 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR QuantumClean-Colorado Springs 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northeastern REMC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valparaiso City Services 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signature Construction LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE TWG Construction, LLC. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Triton Metal Products 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamilton 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halex, a Scott Fetzer Company 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rieke Corporation- Hamilton 46 FTE
NAT-TCR Allied Fire Protection Systems, Inc. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Otterbein Home Health 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR El Paso Health and Rehabilitation 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jamco Products 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 87-Usf-Olf Perimeter 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE D.I.J. Construction 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimble Hospital 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchor Paper Company 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.