Floating covers, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing · Indiana

Triton Metal Products

Hamilton, IN · ~110 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triton Metal Products runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Floating covers, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Triton Metal Products: 5.2 TCR = 157% of Floating covers, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triton Metal Products safety composite

Triton Metal Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2019→2024

Triton Metal Products injury rate improved

Triton Metal Products's TCR fell 10.7 from 12.7 in 2019 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=12.7 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332313 · Hamilton, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 157% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO Norris Cylinder Comp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norris Cylinder Company - Huntsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Triton Metal Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triton Metal Products averages 5.2 TCR (157% of the Floating covers, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triton Metal Products TCR series: 2019=12.7 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Triton Metal Products falls in its industry

449 Floating covers, fabricated me establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 Floating covers, fabricated me employers in Indiana.

Triton Metal Products (110 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Triton Metal Products
Triton Metal Products (110 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Triton Metal Products has more employees than the Floating covers, fabricated metal plate median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2023 6.2 3.1 8 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2021 4.2 3.3 4 1 0
2020 4.6 2.3 4 0 0
2019 12.7 1.7 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332313 · IN · Hamilton

449 Floating covers, fabricated metal plate work, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 6 employers in Hamilton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norris Cylinder Company - Huntsville 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Contract Fabricators, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW Building Components Group Inc - Pontotoc, MS 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Helgesen Industries - IW 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meyer & Najem, Inc. 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction - Indianapolis, IN 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Culy Contracting LLC. 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Excavating, Inc. 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamilton 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZZ Galvanizing - Hamilton 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halex, a Scott Fetzer Company 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rieke Corporation- Hamilton 46 FTE
NAT-TCR North Liberty 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Blind Industries - Salisbury Sewing 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Luke's Des Peres Hospital 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR On My Own Community Services 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Altitude Energy Partners, LLC 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lowes Foods #265 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crane Composites Inc 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Network Controls & Electric, LLC 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.