Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Missouri

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis

St. Louis, MO · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis: 1.8 TCR = 53% of Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis safety composite

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2017→2023

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis injury rate improved

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Hydro - Portland Coa…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydro - Portland Coatings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis averages 1.8 TCR (53% of the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis TCR series: 2017=4.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2020=2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis falls in its industry

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Hot dip galvanizing metals and employers in Missouri.

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis (26 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis
AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis (26 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis has fewer employees than the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal pro median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.7 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MO · St. Louis

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydro - Portland Coatings 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc - Geneva, IL 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PMW - Allmond 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knob Noster Pullets 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE MO96-SEL-HIGHWAY 96- HENS' 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO Hwy 96 006-0138-96, 9G 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Belton Service Cetner 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Reliable Products 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne Wire Die Co. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Graham Engineering Company LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HT Global Circuits 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE First Light Wilderness 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steelhead Composites Headquarters 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norris School District 160 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Champion Charter Sales & Service 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.