Coating metals and metal products for the trade · South Carolina

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology

Duncan, SC · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology safety composite

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2018

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology injury rate improved

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology's TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Duncan, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Hydro - Portland Coa…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydro - Portland Coatings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Coating metals and metal produ employers in South Carolina.

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology (21 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology
Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology (21 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Curtiss-Wright Surface Technology has fewer employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.3 5.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · SC · Duncan

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 104 employers in Duncan, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydro - Portland Coatings 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - St. Louis 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mustang Coatings, LLC. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc - Geneva, IL 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jocassee Hydro 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEC - Awendaw Facility 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Regional Joint Water System 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cely Construction Company, Inc. 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Draexlmaier Automotive 981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Duncan 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fehrer Automotive SC, LLC 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roechling Automotive / Duncan 393 FTE
NAT-TCR Smokey Mountain Sportservice, Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Volvo Logistics Reno PDC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens-Illinois, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Laurel, MS OV102 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Membership 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE DBi Osceola 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Dairy Farmers Store 177 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.