Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing · Texas

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX

Dallas, TX · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX safety composite

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX held a steady TCR band

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/27
  • PHOTO NGSP-VA31
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NGSP-VA31 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX falls in its industry

247 Airborne radio communications establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 27 Airborne radio communications employers in Texas.

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX (79 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX
BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX (79 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

BAE Systems Electronic Systems DTX has fewer employees than the Airborne radio communications equipment median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · TX · Dallas

247 Airborne radio communications equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NGSP-VA31 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN15 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARRIS 15 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HALHV05 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE HOOPER TRUCKING LTD 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fervo Energy 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lipan Service center 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Office 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems MVA 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bard Shannon Ltd 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Las Vegas, NV (1480) 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ceva Animal Health Lenexa 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louisiana Water Company 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Senior Living at Hampton 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE S & J Transportation Services Inc 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modesto Facility 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.