Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing · Indiana

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN

Fort Wayne, IN · ~899 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN: 1.3 TCR = 41% of Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN safety composite

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN injury rate improved

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Fort Wayne, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK P45
  • PHOTO GAGEMAKER, LP
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~899 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GAGEMAKER, LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN averages 1.3 TCR (41% of the Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN falls in its industry

128 Aircraft engine instruments ma establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN (899 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN
BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN (899 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

BAE Systems Electronic Systems FIN has more employees than the Aircraft engine instruments manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.5 3 5 0
2023 1.1 0.5 8 3 0
2022 0.8 0.4 3 3 0
2021 0.6 0.5 3 2 0
2020 1.3 0.9 6 6 0
2019 1.7 0.9 4 12 0
2018 2.2 1.1 11 8 0
2017 1.8 1.1 9 6 0
2016 1.9 1.0 7 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · IN · Fort Wayne

128 Aircraft engine instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 634 employers in Fort Wayne, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GAGEMAKER, LP 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEIA USA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Decision Sciences 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stress-Tek 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Franciscan Health Dyer 901 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_Indianapolis_IN 903 FTE
STATE-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND2 895 FTE
STATE-SIZE 16TH STREET (INI16) 892 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Memorial Hospital 6,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview North Hospital 4,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Corporate Office 3,312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shambaugh & Son LP 3,072 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Clair Gas Fields 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Argus Contracting LP - Phoenix 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Spectrum Solutions, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MCI5 899 FTE
NAT-SIZE MOAC Mall Holdings LLC 899 FTE
NAT-SIZE 268361-Saint Paul Mn P&Dc 899 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OAK3 899 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.