Industry profile · NAICS 334519

Meteorological instruments manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 164 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

164
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
768
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Meteorological instruments manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

1.8
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
164
employers reporting
768
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Meteorological instruments manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Meteorological instruments manufacturing sector (NAICS 334519) encompasses 164 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 768 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Meteorological instruments manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 4
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
TrigTec LLC Redford, MI F 15.8
Shinola Detroit Store Detroit, MI F 11.6
Hexagon Digital Wave Centennial, CO D 6.0
Trimble Redding Redding, CA D 4.6
Seco Manufacturing Company Inc. Redding, CA D 4.4
Acroprint Time Recorder Co Raleigh, NC D 4.3
SECO - Redding CA Redding, CA D 4.1
Dynojet Research MT Belgrade, MT D 4.0
Korvis LLC Corvallis, OR C 3.9
Cranberry HQ Cranberry Township, PA C 3.8
Dynojet Research NV North Las Vegas, NV C 3.6
GEOKON, Inc. Lebanon, NH C 3.5
Sussex Sussex, WI C 3.3
FEV Software and Testing Solutions North America, LLC Redford, MI C 3.3
Vacuum Technology Associates Inc. DBA Dynavac Hingham, MA C 3.3
Saint-Gobain Crystals- Newbury Newbury, OH C 3.2
Unholtz-Dickie Corporation Wallingford, CT C 3.2
Kinemetrics, Inc. Pasadena, CA C 3.1
Gilson Company Lewis Center, OH C 3.1
Shinola, Detroit LLC Detroit, MI C 3.1
Pfeiffer Vacuum Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN C 3.0
FEV Software and Testing Solutions North America, LLC Auburn Hills, MI C 2.9
Mettler Toledo Product Inspection Tampa, FL C 2.9
Luxium Solutions - Newbury Newbury, OH C 2.9
Geometrics San Jose, CA C 2.8
Dynisco Instruments Franklin, MA C 2.8
Gatekeeper Sterling, VA B 2.6
Tel-Tru Manufacturing Rochester, NY B 2.6
Seattle Safety Auburn, WA B 2.5
Kahn Industries, Inc. Wethersfield, CT B 2.5
Enterprise Electronics Corporation Enterprise, AL B 2.3
Met One Instruments, Inc Grants Pass, OR B 2.3
Shortridge Instruments Inc Scottsdale, AZ B 2.3
SKC, Inc-Main Campus Eighty Four, PA B 2.3
Agr International, Inc. Butler, PA B 2.3
Scale-Tec - Harley Ave Anamosa, IA B 2.1
Meggitt Sensing Systems Sunnyvale Sunnyvale, CA B 2.1
Reotemp Instrument Corporation San Diego, CA B 2.0
Marlin Technologies Inc. Horicon, WI B 2.0
Kistler Instrument Corp Buffalo, NY B 2.0
Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc Bellevue, WA B 2.0
Magtrol, Inc. Buffalo, NY B 1.8
Marietta Nondestructive Testing LLC Marietta, GA B 1.8
Ronan Engineering Company Measurements div Florence, KY B 1.7
Magnetic Analysis Corporation Elmsford, NY B 1.7
2967-OK4 Broken Arrow, OK B 1.7
Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation Greenwood, IN A 1.6
Mn157 Mocon, Inc. Brooklyn Park, MN A 1.5
Aero Systems Engineering, Inc Saint Paul, MN A 1.5
Dynamic Systems Inc. Poestenkill Poestenkill, NY A 1.4
Page 1 of 4 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Meteorological instruments manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.